首页> 外文OA文献 >Fairness and undergraduate admission: A qualitative exploration of admissions choices at the University of Oxford
【2h】

Fairness and undergraduate admission: A qualitative exploration of admissions choices at the University of Oxford

机译:公平和本科入学:对牛津大学入学选择的定性探索

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The article investigates unequal admissions patterns at the University of Oxford. Statistical work shows differences in admission rates by social class, ethnicity, gender, qualification status and secondary schooling. In-depth interviews with admissions tutors, college and university officials and observations of eight admissions meetings provide insights into the processes behind those admissions patterns. Results illustrate that adjustment of applicants' performance in the light of their schooling can account for the statistical observation of a lower chance of admission for private school applicants compared with their state school counterparts. The advantage in admissions chances enjoyed by post-qualification applicants appears to be related to the lower risk they pose with regards to their attainment. Little direct evidence is found, however, to explain inequalities in admission rates by social class, ethnicity and gender. A tentative suggestion is made that homophilic tendencies among selectors might account for these unequal admissions rates. It is recommended that future research should use different methods, such as experiments or detailed observations, to gain a better viewpoint on these proposed mechanisms. The article concludes by considering implications for policy and the social stratification literature. © 2010 Taylor & Francis.
机译:本文研究了牛津大学的不平等录取模式。统计工作显示按社会阶层,种族,性别,资格状态和中学程度的录取率存在差异。对招生导师,大学和大学官员的深入访谈以及对八次招生会议的观察,可以洞悉这些招生模式背后的过程。结果表明,根据就学情况调整申请人的表现可以从统计学上说明,与公立学校相比,私立学校申请人的入学机会较低。资格后的申请人在录取机会上的优势似乎与他们获得学历的风险降低有关。但是,几乎没有直接证据可以解释按社会阶层,种族和性别划分的入学率不平等现象。提出了一个初步建议,即选择者之间的同性恋倾向可能导致了这些不平等的录取率。建议将来的研究应使用不同的方法,例如实验或详细的观察,以更好地了解这些拟议的机制。本文最后通过考虑对政策和社会分层文献的启示。 ©2010泰勒和弗朗西斯。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zimdars, Anna;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号